Goodbye Democracy, Hello Technocracy | Patrick Wood

A tectonic-level battle could soon take place over the fundamental structure of America, and hardly anyone sees it coming. Nevertheless, I am making a bold prediction for 2017.

With the Democrat party seemingly in total upheaval after the 2016 Presidential election, it boggles the mind at how fast political fortunes can change these days. Democrats, liberals, leftist and progressives have arguably realized that the current system of things political has become impenetrable to them, and that they will not move forward by gaming the existing political machinery any longer.

Instead, watch for a new mantra: “Since Democracy* is irrefutably broken, let’s just throw it under the bus and start afresh with… Technocracy.” In other words, if you can’t get rid of Trump, then get rid of the office altogether.

(The efforts and methods of the Trilateral Commission since its founding in 1973 to resurrect historic Technocracy have been thoroughly documented in my book, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation.)

First, note that there have been a rash of articles appearing recently in globalist media hammering on the failure of and soon demise of Democracy.

According to globalist reasoning, Democracy was a useful tool to get us to where we are today, but it is woefully inadequate to take us into the future. It’s dead. It’s over. It’s time for something new, a final solution to America’s myriad problems.

Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted this in his 1970 book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role In the Technetronic Era, namely, that Communism and Socialism were necessary stepping stones to get to the end game, but they were not the end game in themselves. The final target was to be Brzezinski’s Technetronic Era, which I pointedly contend is little more than warmed over Technocracy from the 1930s. In 1973, Brzezinski co-founded the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller to create a “New International Economic Order”.

Second, President Obama took only eight years to systematically deconstruct America using radical Marxist tactics. It was a thoroughly effective game plan, and it has decidedly broken the existing political/economic system in the process. In fact, it was so broken that Hillary Clinton, the mistress of political gamesmanship, could not even win the 2016 Presidential election! This ‘failure’ happened as Trilateral Commission members surrounded Obama for all eight years of his tenure as President, and as Clinton and her campaign was carefully managed by Trilateral bigwig John Podesta.

After 40 years of careful observation, I have concluded that the globalist strategy is always played like a chess game. They think several moves ahead of us, and they use every means possible to cover their tracks and to mislead about their future intentions. Antony Sutton and I broke their code in the 1970s, and I attest that nothing has changed today.

Thus, the next move on this grand chess board will be to fuel the flames of discontents who call for (demand) trashing democracy altogether. Simultaneously, Technocracy will be presented as the perfect, if not only, solution to replace it.

So, it is no coincidence that global scholar Parag Khanna’s new book, Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-State, will be released on Tuesday, January 10, 2017, just 10 days prior to Inauguration Day for President-elect Trump. Nor is it a coincidence that Khanna has already gained a major platform of progressive media to push his radical ideas:

What is he proposing? The marketing text for Khanna’s Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-Statemost likely written by himself, states:

“American democracy just isn’t good enough anymore… The ideal form of government for the complex 21st century is what Khanna calls a ‘direct technocracy,’ one led by experts but perpetually consulting the people through a combination of democracy and data. From a seven-member presidency and a restructured cabinet to replacing the Senate with an Assembly of Governors, Technocracy in America is full of sensible proposals that have been proven to work in the world’s most successful societies. Americans have a choice for whom they elect president, but they should not wait any longer to redesign their political system following Khanna’s pragmatic vision.”

Some readers will immediately reject my prediction as being ridiculous, stating that Technocracy will never gain any foothold in America. Such readers would do well to review history; in the 1930’s and 40s, there were over 500,000 card-carrying, dues-paying members of Technocracy, Inc. and it was wildly popular with millions of other Americans. If Americans were dumb enough to believe it then, they can be dumb enough to believe it today.

You can test my prediction in coming weeks and months in two ways. First, watch for calls to end democracy or radically restructure government. Second, watch for increased media coverage of Khanna’s call for a ‘direct technocracy’ in America. Some of the high points of Khanna’s book include,

  • Abolishing the electoral college
  • Turning the presidency into an Executive Committee with multiple members
  • Abolishing the Senate, replacing it with executive Technocrats from each state
  • Transferring custody of the Constitution from the Senate to the Supreme Court
  • Filling civil service positions with apolitical Technocrats
  • Removing politicians from any influence on operational issues regarding society

Trilaterals and global elite strategists are not the only people in the world who can play chess. I have just given you their most-likely next move in advance, so the only question that remains is, how you will answer that move?

* Yes, America was founded as a Constitutional Republic, but progressives and elitists do not recognize this form of government. Therefore, they will never refer to America as anything other than a Democracy.

The Privacyless, Freedomless Smart City of 2030 the Elite Are Engineering

by Truthstream Media

Well here’s a fat bag of crazy for you, courtesy of the elites over at Davos ahead of their 2017 meeting. Add cashless in there of course, we would have but there are only so many words that will fit into a YouTube video title. If you look around at the way things are being manipulated on nearly every level right now, you can clearly see how society is being engineered for this future, as insane as it sounds…

Aaron & Melissa Dykes are the founders of, Subscribe to them on YouTube, Like on Facebook, Follow on Twitter.

Watch their mini-documentary Obsolete here.

Let Us Defeat the Corrupt System by defunding the Medical Mafia supporting the fake news media networks, which promote terrorism and regime change around the world. Build your own Comprehensive Antiviral System, and start enjoying healthcare freedom today.

6 thoughts on “Goodbye Democracy, Hello Technocracy | Patrick Wood”

  1. Sorry Democracy was destroyed years ago, many years it started with British Empire asset Andrew Jackson taking down the American System, since we had to Presidents that were going to reinstall the American system but they died before they could implement the changes (FDR & JFK) But then after JFK’s death there was an increase in the decline, Wall Street engineering the take down of FDR’s Glass-Steagall, Being involved in Continuous wars , Until Fascism then took hold like it or not the Legacy of Bush & Obama is Fascism. Americans only think they have a democracy. Wall Street/City of London is not going to give up the people said no to their asset Hillary Clinton who was completely corrupted by Obama. They are now trying to tell the people they were not smart enough to vote against Clinton – It was the Russians that caused Trump to win not the people. The only thing the Russians did was Putin made Obama look like a fool every time.

    1. Von der “Bürokratie” konnte und kann nie alles Bewältigt werden so, dass die einzige logische Schlussfolgerung die Technokratie ist ( Tendenz Steigend) Und in Bezug zu Verständnis von “Demokratie” hat es die nie gegeben .Deren Bedeutung und Ursprung beutet , Mit und Eigenverantwortung, Entscheidung und Mitentscheidung ,Bestimmung und Mitbestimmung .Wobei die Grundvoraussetzung absoluten geistige Gesundheit ist, inklusive ein hoher Level von Einfühlungsvermögen,Kompetenz und einen sehr hohen Level an Verantwortungsbewusstsein,welche Politiker die gewählt wurden um die Interessen der Allgemeinheit vertreten sollen, absolute Prioritäten einräumen.
      Das gesamte Paket im Gesamtbild,sind die Ursachen ,worüber sich fast jeder Beschwert ,ob nun im Zusammenhang von Technokratie oder mangel an Demokratie ….Darüber sollte man mal nachdenken .Denn jede falsche und inkompetente Entscheidung ,sei es aus Eigennutz oder abhängigen Motiven hat schwerwiegende folgen in dem Land wo sie getroffen werden …

  2. Than you for your blog! $$$aturn $47 is a funny donation number as it is twice the Earth’s tilt angle and used in a Star Tetrahedron and the 47th longitude goes right through Bern , Switzerland where commercial trade in souls goes off planet via the Universal a Postal Union.

    As the blog title is “Covert” Geopolitics please view the info starting at the 42 minute mark here:

    Time and the Technosphere. Swiss watchmakers? CERN?

  3. The founders of the American colonies were brilliant ..

    Their first misstep, was venturing beyond the ..

    Articles of Confederation ..

    That anything beyond that, was a “Bankers Enterprise.”

    Tells you plenty here ..

    The “Articles” guaranteed autonomy and pure sovereignty ..

    For the individuals states ..

    Whether they be 13+, or 50+ in the future ..

    It did not give centralization of power much chance ..

    Of getting a foothold ..

    Ambassador Wanta here explains what we are missing .. [1]

    Consider what 50+ new voters in the UN Security Council would mean ..

    Would a “UN” survive much past that kind of “reorganization?”

    The UN has nothing to do with — “unity.”

    It has everything to do with — “control.”

    The Office of the POTUS has served its purpose ..

    It was culminated with the demise of the USSR ..

    What need for a “union” and a leader of that union is longer necessary?

    To “combat” what general and world/global threat?

    If NATO is not necessary, than why is the failed experiment of “federalism?”

    Need be beaten to death like a dead horse?

    This is simple ..

    You beat these guys at their own game ..

    MONEY makes the world go round (whether it spins or not) ..

    And YES ..

    WE have PLENTY of it!

    * Further amplification, with further added special effects: (for Michael Bay and John Woo fans)

    [1] (with added special effects, for Michael Bay fans)

We do appreciate sensible comments...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.