The National Security Agency is A Criminal Organization

Years before Edward Snowden provided documented proof that the National Security Agency was really a national insecurity agency as it was violating law and the US Constitution and spying indiscriminately on American citizens, William Binney, who designed and developed the NSA spy program revealed the illegal and unconstitutional spying.

by Paul Craig Roberts

Binney turned whistleblower, because NSA was using the program to spy on Americans. As Binney was well known to the US Congress, he did not think he needed any NSA document to make his case. But what he found out was “Congress would never hear me because then they’d lose plausible deniability.

That was really their key. They needed to have plausible deniability so they can continue this massive spying program because it gave them power over everybody in the world. Even the members of Congress had power against others [in Congress]; they had power on judges on the Supreme Court, the federal judges, all of them. That’s why they’re so afraid.

Everybody’s afraid because all this data that’s about them, the central agencies — the intelligence agencies — they have it. And that’s why Senator Schumer warned President Trump earlier, a few months ago, that he shouldn’t attack the intelligence community because they’ve got six ways to Sunday to come at you. That’s because it’s like J. Edgar Hoover on super steroids. . . . it’s leverage against every member of parliament and every government in the world.”

To prevent whistle-blowing, NSA has “a program now called ‘see something, say something’ about your fellow workers. That’s what the Stasi did. That’s why I call [NSA] the new New Stasi Agency. They’re picking up all the techniques from the Stasi and the KGB and the Gestapo and the SS. They just aren’t getting violent yet that we know of — internally in the US, outside is another story.”

As Binney had no documents to give to the media, blowing the whistle had no consequence for NSA. This is the reason that Snowden released the documents that proved NSA to be violating both law and the Constitution, but the corrupt US media focused blame on Snowden as a “traitor” and not on NSA for its violations.

Whistleblowers are protected by federal law. Regardless, the corrupt US government tried to prosecute Binney for speaking out, but as he had taken no classified document, a case could not be fabricated against him.

Binney blames the NSA’s law-breaking on Dick “Darth” Cheney. He says NSA’s violations of law and Constitution are so extreme that they would have to have been cleared at the top of the government.

Binney describes the spy network, explains that it was supposed to operate only against foreign enemies, and that using it for universal spying so overloads the system with data that the system fails to discover many terrorist activities.

Apparently, the National Security Agency values being able to blackmail citizens and members of government at home and abroad more than preventing terrorist attacks.

Unfortunately for Americans, there are many Americans who blindly trust the government and provide the means, the misuse of which is used to enslave us. A large percentage of the work in science and technology serves not to free people but to enslave them. By now there is no excuse for scientists and engineers not to know this. Yet they persist in their construction of the means to destroy liberty.

30 thoughts on “The National Security Agency is A Criminal Organization”

  1. “President Harry S. Truman authorized the creation of NSA in a letter he wrote in June 1952, which itself remained classified for decades. It was formally established through a revision of National Security Council Intelligence Directive 9 on Oct. 24, 1952, and officially came into existence on Nov. 4.”

    Not created under the strictures of the US Constitution, therefore illegal and criminal at birth.

    Just another tyrannical agency of the rogue US Tyranny that is in occupation of the American country.

    _Liberty is a demand. Tyranny submission._

    1. ALL the “Alphabet Agencies” are CRIMINAL ORGANIZATIONS…Homeland Security is the ABSOLUTE worst of ALL…IT was Birthed in NAZI Germany…You Know the war WE were SUPPOSED to have Defeated in WW2…Remember???
      They ALL get “Trained” by the VATICAN…Remember THAT Too???

  2. My comments can’t be sensible, given the circumstances…. DUMB FUCKS!!!! I would volunteer as an assassin to pull the trigger! Line em’ up!!! I’m 70 and extremely tired of shit and lies!!!~ beware of us old guys!!! I open carry…

    1. They are all in on it. Churchill the bloody lot!! Did any affluent properties get bombed and I mean bombed during the war. As far as I know buckingham palace sustained minor damage. But streets were wiped out where the poorer folk were housed. Now if you want a war to end quickly what do you do? You takeout the huge estates including palaces, the banks, roadways, power stations, and fuel depots or supply lines.

  3. The Fourth Reich has been based in the City of London for a long time now [1688?], even during WWII. Its the [money] centre of the khazar’s empire, has been for long time now. To continue to ignore history and not ‘follow the money’ but simply rely on explanations that focus on satanic counter-culture is as myopic as believing the Vatican prints its own money. Could be something in the water over yonder?

  4. @Bernard
    OBVIOUSLY, someone didn’t post my response to You about the ORIGINS, or Creators of the “City of London”…Geeeee I wonder WHY???
    The ROMAN Empire Took over what is called the UK LONG Before IT was called the UK…REMEMBER???
    That simply means the UK, even though trying to disconnect with the Vatican at some point STILL was “Retained” by the Vatican sometime during the “Victorian era”…REMEMBER???
    That means THEY are Still subject to the VATICAN…Understand???

  5. The suggestion that Rome conquered the British isles is historically incorrect – Hadrian’s Wall was built to stop the ‘Picts’ from marauding southwards towards the Romans’ settlements. This well established fact means the Romans never got anywhere near owning the UK in antiquity. Oh, and it is well accepted that the Romans abandoned Londinium etc. well before the Empire’s collapse in/around the 7th century AD.

    Thereafter, the UK was subject to many different cultural and ethnic influences and control – eg, the Anglo-Saxons, who were the progenitors of this fine language we use called English. Again, historical fact that clearly conflicts with the theory of a perennial Roman conquest, all the way down to the fact that neither Latin, nor modern Italian were the national language of the UK.

    As to the UK trying to disconnect, again, read about Venice, Paolo Sarpi and Venetian/ Black Guelph backing of Protestanism to achieve control of Rome, the Papacy and is legacies using the deft hand of Machiavellian statecraft – have you read “The Prince”, or heard about “The league of Cambrai? Again, to consider these events as the UK “trying to disconnect” is not objective fact based argument.

    Did you know that hidden in Venice since the middle ages are at least 8 very grand synagogues, representing a variety of Judaic sects, including Khazars? Venice has NO ROMAN RUINS, very unlike the UK and the rest of the old Empire. Quite unique.

    I worry that emotional responses obscure good judgement, and lead to anger and abuse, let alone senseless violence and human suffering.

  6. The Black Guelphs defeated the White Ghibellines in the middle ages, and secured control of the papacy. This internecine war went on for quite some time, spread across the continent and the UK. The Guelphs were wealthy trading merchants, of unknown origin, but were largely based in Venice. ER II traces her family’s heritage to the Guelphs, who really established their links to European hegemony through Bavaria, Southern Germany [the other side of the Tyrol].

    Venice backed the House of Orange, who took the UK throne in 1688, and then the UK had lots of German Kings, and Victoria married Albert, a German Prince. Do you know about the historical basis of what today is called a PA [Prince Alfred], which is simply another form of male genital mutilation?

    Venice’s swamp was never a Roman site, and has NO Roman ruins or structures. How come they conquered everywhere else, even built Hadrian’s Wall in the north of England, but could not build one cobble-stone path anywhere near Piazza San Marco, the Grand Canal or the Lido? This all remains unexplained, even by cross-cultural historical works. Who were the Venetians, and how and why did they ultimately rise to rule the nobility and religious institutions of Europe, including the Throne of the UK?

    Most English speaking people have been denied good education, and in particular multi-linguistic abilities have not been pursued. Simply put, this keeps people unnecessarily dumbed-down, and much easier to implant [by innuendo among other things] the history of the winners of wars and not the truth.

    1. Witch is WHY the white race “Version” called HIS-Story Cannot be trusted as being a TRUTHFUL account about what actually happened.

      1. The “white race” did not write the perverted history’s, so to make such allegation is false, illogical and misrepresentative. It is also offensive to white race people who have neither written it, or agree with such version of events.

        “HIS-story” is a made-up phrase that has no meaning to speakers of English, and has no official or unofficial definition. Communication should not be compromised as such, it only leads to misunderstanding and thus irreconcilable differences.

  7. Oh, and to end on some more Germanic tid-bits and factoids, we all know [don’t we?] that the Windsor family [the ones who sit on the UK Throne] , prior to WWII, still used their GERMAN triple banger moniker: Saxe Goethe Coburg. I guess after the war they thought that to cover-up Edward VII’s predisposition towards Nazism they better ditch the GERMAN name from popular use.

    Of course we have not even got into the development of the House of Rothschild [nee Frankfort based german-jewish banker Amschel Bauer] and its inexorable rise to own the Bank of England, and then meld into so-called British Royalty – Baron de Rothschild et al.

    All this history mitigates against the theory of perennial Roman rule in the UK.

  8. I take it from the lack of any form of counter-argument that this is evidence of a concession, and a withdrawal from claims that the Romans conquered the British isles, among many other claims made above and elsewhere on this site.

    Accordingly, German/British elitists have been writing perverted accounts of history serving their war/rape/pillage mentality to a T. The only question I have is who really are these perverted souls? where did they come from, and who are their fore-fathers?

    1. The very same question that I have been asking for some time. Born out of a secret society whereby some demonic forces were conjured up from another dimension.
      I was reading the voyages of Christopher Columbus to the Americas and how beautiful and bountiful he describes the islands of Haiti, Cuba etc in both fauna, flora and people. He further mentions how healthy they were all, no vaccines etc. And just look at the state of those places after colonisation and the implant of money systems.
      Something very wrong and for men to lend a helping hand to these immoral acts is beyond my comprehension. Man needs to stop doing this to others.

    2. Actually bernard…You fell “Nicely” into WHAT I expected about YOU…Next time you attempt to shame someone who YOU “Believe” to be BELOW your “Supposed” education grade…Ask your self: DID I DELIBERATELY Miss spell my words to FISH-Out people Like You…as “Feeling” Superior to OTHER races???

  9. Shame may be an emotional state experience for people who constantly attempt to moralise as form of dealing with their own cognitive dissonance.

    Moralising to others based on extreme unsubstantiated beliefs is often an outward attempt to feel superior when someone has an INFERIORITY COMPLEX.

    Aggressive communication styles are characterised by the almost exclusive use of the second person [singular] ‘you’. This appears to be the essence of the above posting. Certainly not assertive and without real integrity.

    I use my intellect [and vocabulary] to communicate assertively and clearly.

    1. The ONLY thing I SEE about your comments is a “Creature” with a Giant EGO, born and raised “Inside-The-Box” education and FITS “Perfectly” the type described by Dr. Francis Wellsing using so-called “White Supremacy” intellect.
      Your “Balloon” is about to be “Popped” SOON.

We do appreciate sensible comments...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.